On 03/10/2007, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > On 02 Oct 2007 13:12:31 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Issues pending FESCO ratification: > > > * Naming of TeX-related packages: > > > * http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-September/msg00066.html > > > * Accepted (5 - 0) > > > > Presumably package names should be changed for F8? > > Certainly not. We are past test3, texlive is still not in, and it is not > a big deal. Additionally, it would be nice to have the virtual provides > also in, jindrich was inclined to add them, before we adjust the > packages. F9 would be a more realistic target, in my opinion, without > pressure on the maintainers to change names in case they have more > important business to do. OK, good - thanks for clarification. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
