On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:31:48PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 02 Oct 2007 13:12:31 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Issues pending FESCO ratification: > > * Naming of TeX-related packages: > > * http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-September/msg00066.html > > * Accepted (5 - 0) > > Presumably package names should be changed for F8? Certainly not. We are past test3, texlive is still not in, and it is not a big deal. Additionally, it would be nice to have the virtual provides also in, jindrich was inclined to add them, before we adjust the packages. F9 would be a more realistic target, in my opinion, without pressure on the maintainers to change names in case they have more important business to do. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
