-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:32:42 -0400 Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 16:09 -0600, Lamont Peterson wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:01:32 -0400 > > Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Changing that probably means committing to partitioning changes > > > sooner > > > > I not sure that it would. After all, yum can deal with swapping > > CDs and it will ask you for whichever one it wants next, which > > should also work for multiple-DVD installs as long as there isn't > > an assumption of how many discs a DVD can install can be. > > The problem is that we have to mount and look at the additional CDs to > get their metadata and know what packages are available there. And to > do that, we have to transfer stage2 elsewhere. To RAM kind of sucks > because it increases the memory requirements by the size of stage2 > (~100M) in a case where we're going to need more memory for package > metadata and dep solving. Hence, the hard drive, hence partitioning > being committed sooner. So, even if it's another 200MB of RAM, is there anything wrong with saying, "If you want to include 'add-on' discs, you need to have X amount of RAM minimum to do the install." ?? After all, I only have 2 machines with less than a GB of RAM anymore (and I wouldn't do add-on discs with those, anyway). - -- Lamont Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] NOTE: All messages from this email address should be digitally signed with my 0xDC0DD409 GPG key. It is available on the pgp.mit.edu keyserver as well as other keyservers that sync with MIT's. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG/agl+YBsl9wN1AkRAl4BAJ4qed1aTylaS89/LxO5PTMbPPLRSgCgn/ti iNeTTL5oziV3BduoaUKp1/4= =VeTK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
