On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:56:01 -0400 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:51:55 -0400 > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > that's fine by me - but I don't think removing /srv from filesystem > > pkg makes any sense. > > Doesn't make sense to me either, I hope I didn't sound otherwise. > > +1 to keeping /srv > -1 to allowing any package to put any content in /srv Whether or not you agree with the FHS, it does make some useful points. Following it as a recommendation or guideline seems like the best idea. I've viewed /srv as another /usr/local, but without a vendor-provided directory structure. Other than it existing as a top level directory, we shouldn't do anything with it. The only argument I can see to that is where do we stop we top level provided directories? I think /srv is reasonable as an example and admins can take it from there. Packages shouldn't dump anything in there. On another note, could we please stop the +1 and -1 garbage replies to people? Just say you agree or disagree. Where did the +1 and -1 trend come from because it's really freaking annoying. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat / Westford, MA
Attachment:
pgp4xK0dI9Upv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
