Le jeudi 20 septembre 2007 à 21:21 +0530, Rahul Sundaram a écrit : > > We were talking about whether RHEL plays a different role from Fedora > and whether there are significant technical differences in between them. > I have given examples of the differences and the impact on the roles > they play. You have given differences on the support model; they do not have to translate in user interaction differences. Fedora does not aim to be the anti-RHEL, there is significant feature overlap or Red Hat would not be funding Fedora, so can we please stop using the RHEL scarecrow argument? If the enterprise and home space were so different, Microsoft would not have succeeded as wildly as it did. There are far more similarities than differences, home users like stability too, and enterprise users do not disdain pretty gui apps when they're done properly. And server-like home appliances are inundating the market now. Enterprise and home do not have the same priority order, but the items on their priority lists are the same, and good software will register on both (and likewise, bad software may be tolerated a bit longer in one context, but that it fails to pass on the other should raise alarms) Having narrow focus only leads to debacles like NetworkManager, where it's belately realised a feature needs to be deployed everywhere after all, but can't be because one set of constrains was deliberately ignored at project start. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
