Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Richi Plana wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:03 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 07:33 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
Both packages (firefox and xulrunner) provides gecko-libs and
currently can't be installed together.
AFAIK, the gecko-lib provides should not be a problem. The only problem
I am aware of is that both firefox and xulrunner packages
have /etc/gre.d/gre(64).conf files.
Can't firefox be cut down so that it doesn't include it's own gecko-libs
but instead uses xulrunner so that it's just like any other gecko app
(Disclaimer: I'm not really familiar with xulrunner so don't shoot me)?
That's the plan.
If I understood the discussion regarding xulrunner correctly the whole
reason the Mozilla people aren't shipping a xulrunner based version of
Firefox is because they don't want to be limited by a runtime that needs to
be stable rather than cutting edge. If Fedora plans to ship a xulrunner
based Firefox anyway wouldn't that basically require a fork of the code?
Regards,
Dennis
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
