On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 23:20 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > I noticed, xulrunner was successfully built for devel (finally), but I > see there one issue - it obsoletes firefox < 2.1 but it does not supply > it's functionality (unless you use only the libraries, like in epiphany, > liferea, etc.). If I understand it correctly it means that tomorrow's > rawhide will have a lot of dependency problems (new gecko-libs and > removal of firefox) and on systems that don't have any packages > dependent on firefox or gecko-libs even a removal of firefox. This isn't > intended, is it? Or do you have already prepared firefox 3 (still alpha) > for rawhide? An easy solution to this, IMHO, would be removal of the > obsolete from xulrunner and removal of the gre(64).conf file from > firefox package (it clashes with xulrunner's). My understanding of this matter is that anything which depends on Gecko should be depending on gecko-devel (at build-time) and/or gecko-libs (at run-time). These virtuals are provided by both the Firefox and XULrunner packages, and therefore should allow smoothly upgrading from the former to the latter. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
