Re: Fedora 8 Test 2 Release Notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:44:42 -0800
"Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> should nspluginwrapper drag it in?

Not sure that makes sense.  The problem is it needs to be a library
specific Require, so that the correct arch package will get dragged
in.  A requirement on "pulseaudio-lib" just won't cut it as that would
be satisfied by "pulseaudio-lib.x86_64".  I know there is some work
going on in rpm5 that will do arch specific provides, maybe even
requires to, but that is future land that we may pull into rpm.org.
Until then we need something of a solution for Fedora 8.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux