On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 23:53 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> 3. Improve the system-config-services. Its great tool and has great
> potential but its confusing at first look. We need to provide to each
> service such a description *AND* name that everyone (well, I exaggerate
> here a little...) will understand it.
See my posting "plans for system-config-services, was: early-gdm redux"
on fedora-desktop-list. Basically: yes, s-c-services is confusing to
users right now, one thing to make it easier is remove the visual
distinction between SysVinit and xinetd based services by way of tabs. I
don't think anybody wants to tell s-c-services which type of service
shall be configured ;-). That's one thing I want to change for Fedora 9,
I've planned more and will hopefully get around to it all.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
