On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 15:00 +0200, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:58:33 +0200 > Martin Sourada <martin.sourada@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think we should rather take a loooong thought and add to FirstBoot > > one screen for selecting services, which would be easy and simple to > > use. You would have there a combo with Desktop/Notebook/Server > > choices, and some checkboxes for optional services (but with sane > > names). I can imagine that as nobody needs bluetooth on server, on > > Desktop nearly nobody needs running power manager, etc. We should > > take a thought and decide what services should be enabled by default > > and what services should be easily available for user enabling during > > first boot (most likely the cups one, but MUST be called something > > like Printer Support). > > Actually my feeling is that we should get rid of as many firstboot > screens as possible and just pick reasonable defaults. The tools are > there if a curious user needs to adjust something. So much of what we > ask is just silly. > Yes, most ARE, but the one with services could be useful. There is a batch of services that are useful on most of notebooks, but are unneeded on most of Desktops/Servers and vice versa. And we'd like to get rid of as much unneeded services as possible, so if we target the default ones with a thought of the target platform, it would be IMHO more effective. Maybe it could go to anaconda, but personally I think that first boot is better place for that. > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
