>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:54:19 +0100, >>>>> "JU" == "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: JU> On 12/09/2007, Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:24:25 -0400, >> >>>>> "TC" == "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> TC> New guidelines describing how to package GNU Emacs and XEmacs addon TC> packages can be found here: TC> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs >> >> I just looked at that guideline and realized that the >> template suggests making emacs-common-%{pkg} as srpm. I >> thought CVS module name should be the same as srpm name and >> it should be usually the same as the upstream tarball name >> or what they prefer. or does this mean we are going to make >> an exception for Emacsen packages to have such CVS module >> name? JU> Yes - that's been the case for a long time now - this comes from the JU> previous package naming guidelines and was discussed at length JU> previously - please see threads on fedora-packaging recently for those JU> references. Ah, thank you for the reference. I entirely missed that mailing list :/ let me read them through the archives. Thanks, -- Akira TAGOH
Attachment:
pgpFkFlgcvkxk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
