On 12/09/2007, Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:24:25 -0400, > >>>>> "TC" == "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > TC> New guidelines describing how to package GNU Emacs and XEmacs addon > TC> packages can be found here: > TC> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs > > I just looked at that guideline and realized that the > template suggests making emacs-common-%{pkg} as srpm. I > thought CVS module name should be the same as srpm name and > it should be usually the same as the upstream tarball name > or what they prefer. or does this mean we are going to make > an exception for Emacsen packages to have such CVS module > name? Yes - that's been the case for a long time now - this comes from the previous package naming guidelines and was discussed at length previously - please see threads on fedora-packaging recently for those references. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
