On 12/09/2007, Richi Plana <myfedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hans, how about this for an idea: re-write the > gstreamer-plugins-bad.spec so that it puts the various plugins in > separate packages and make gstreamer-plugins-bad a virtual package that > Requires all of the plugins to pull them in? +2 > I was going to do that for my system, privately. Unfortunately, I don't > know how to rename the main part of the sub-packages name. I was > planning on using the scheme "gstreamer-plugin-<module>" for the modules > and "gstreamer-plugins-bad" for the virtual package, but I can't figure > out how to change the root name. I'd really rather not use > "gstreamer-plugins-bad-<module>" if possible (actually, I'd rather not > use ANY filenames, if possible. I've posted several times against the > idea of storing meta-info in filenames). Any ideas? Yes, this is an excellent plan. The only thing that stopped me doing it myself was that I'd have ended up having to rebuild a load of *other* packages to change their Requires: and so on ... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
