On Sa September 8 2007, Hans de Goede wrote: > As it currently stands umbrello is just plain unfindable to end users, as > you know I'm not some noob. I even searched for in progress reviews of > umbrello. > > Also I think it is a very bad idea to ship packages with a clearly seperate > upstream in some kinda bundle form. Sticking with the umbrello example, in > order for the latest version to be included into Fedora, we must wait for a > new upstream kdesdk release, which likely won't happen before there is a > kdesdk4 in some far away future, as kde3 is as good as EOL. > > Notice that umbrello and kdesdk are just an example, this goes for other > Aggregation upstreams too. > > Since on of Fedora's strenghts is being always up to date with the latest > upstream versions, I think using these kind of upstream aggregation > projects is a BAD idea as it creates interlocks with regards to versions > between clearly seperate projects like kdesdk and umbrello. I agree completely. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list