Re: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:13:22 +0200
In-reply-to: <46E29FC6.4090103@xxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615)

Hans de Goede wrote:


p.s.


Thats p.s. should have been:

Regards,

Hans

(copy paste mess up)

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
  - From: Hans de Goede

Prev by Date: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
Next by Date: Re: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
Previous by thread: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
Next by thread: Re: Aggregation upstream projects are BAD (kdesdk for example)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux