On 9/6/07, Christopher Brown <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 06/09/07, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 15:09 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > > > On 06/09/07, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Umm, no. As one of the three people moderating said list, > > > doing a quick > > > look at who has argued in favor of not closing the list, > > > everyone of > > > them is subscribed. > > > > > > Then whither ye voice in days of yore oh nay-sayers? > > > > Some of us actually have day jobs that don't involve Fedora, and haven't > > the time to comment on every thread. ;) > > > > Normally I would agree but: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00530.html > > was over two weeks ago and not one voice against until today. > Yes.. at 2 weeks I would say that even if you are subscribed to a list.. if you aren't reading it or replying to important threads.. you aren't really a part of the list. If you have to wait until the discussion is moved over to the one you do care about.. then that is further argument that the other list is not important. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
