Re: RFC: Naming guidelines for packages extending GIMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 14:00 +0200, KH KH wrote:
> 2007/9/5, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > during the review of the resynthesizer plugin for GIMP
> > [ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ], I asked the
> > package to be named "gimp-plugin-resynthesizer" rather than
> > "gimp-resynthesizer". Ewan brought up the point that there isn't really
> > a naming guideline for it, therefore I'd like to propose one:
> 
> cinepaint should probably follow the same guideline if ever there is plugins...
> 
> I've recently discovered that there is perl scripts to be used with gimp
> http://search.cpan.org/~sjburges/Gimp-2.0/Gimp.pm
> 
> If ever someone want to package them, the guideline may need to cover
> the case...

This is very old and has in fact been distributed in old versions of
GIMP, but I don't think it's up to snuff with current versions. If
someone thinks about packaging it, please check whether it is ;-).

Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux