On Wed 05-Sep-2007 at 11:28 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > during the review of the resynthesizer plugin for GIMP > [ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ], I asked the > package to be named "gimp-plugin-resynthesizer" rather than > "gimp-resynthesizer". Ewan brought up the point that there isn't really > a naming guideline for it, therefore I'd like to propose one: > > For packages specific to GIMP (i.e. not just extensions of a separate > application like xsane, ufraw): > > Plugins and scripts(*): "gimp-plugin-<name>" > Patterns: "gimp-pattern-<name>" > Brushes: "gimp-brush-<name>" > Themes: "gimp-theme-<name>" This makes sense, but how many patterns, brushes and themes are there likely to be? I agree that plugins and scripts are all just 'plugins' to the end-user and shouldn't be differentiated. The fact that this is the first gimp plugin in fedora reminds me that fedora is very weak in this direction - Perhaps an 'imaging SIG' is needed? -- Bruno -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
