Martin Sourada wrote:
Yes, it is distribution's responsibility, but the goal here is to make the boot process more effective. That means point out services we don't need and remove them from default configuration. If we can do this process fully automatic and dependant on hardware, than I am all for it not being in anaconda or first boot.
That is what is being worked upon atleast incrementally.
Another thing is system-config-services. Do we want users to use it? If yes then we need to make it as much as possible fool-proof. That basically means that we should give sane names there and not just name of the services - everyone knows what bluetooth means, not anyone knows what cups is. Sometimes description is enough, sometimes the description is misleading, hard to understand.
File a bug report with suggestions for better short descriptive messages. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
