Jeff Spaleta wrote:
Now.. it is up to anyone who disagrees with Mr. Jackson's informed historical account of the usefulness of inf parsing.. to dig out an inf file for a specific piece of hardware that doesn't currently work with Fedora's auto-detection and show...specifically..that the information provided in the inf file is enough to fix the issues that Mr. Jackson has stated can't be resolved with information from the inf file. Stop arguing that the inf should have the information necessary.. .and start showing that they do.
Isn't the fact that windows works with them a pretty good demonstration?
I FORBID arguments for arguments sake. If you want to argue with me about that, i suggest we open up a fedora-arguments-list.
OK, where do we sign up?
Adam Jackson has previously done just that... he wrote quite succinctly that information in inf files is not enough to solve the underlying problems.
Is he suggesting that windows uses magic? I thought he meant instead that X doesn't use the information sensibly.
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
