On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:20:14AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > I >> don't know if it matters, but if FESCo can limit the packages one can add >> to fedora with technical reasons >> accepted by the packagers themselves, then I don't think >> Fedora is for me. > > If you want to consider the broader impact of things, there are things like > alternative kernels or kernel modules or compatibility libraries etc that > are being excluded or being considered for exclusion by reasons other than > just the willingness of package maintainers. This isn't something new and > we shouldn't be pretending that it is. I am not saying that the willingness of package maintainers should be enough to have a package in. But technical reasons, implementation or quality should guide the rejection of the package, not FESCo willingness. FESCo of course can make a final decision, but only when there is indeed a disagreement and a side has a sound rational. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
