-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> We can add the recommendation but we can't eliminate the "SRPM is >> canonical" language as long as people still want the SRPM to be the >> canonical location. To remove the exception, you'll have to talk to the >> devs involved to see whether they're against moving into hosted.fp.o. >> >> If everyone wants to we'd be happy to get rid of the exception :-) > > The next thing would be is to list out the packages which has the > packages as the canonical source, contact the developers and ask them if > they are willing to move to hosted. Seth is working on this. I haven't looked at it because not all packages are reviewed yet.... and therefore not all packages are going to have proper Source: lines or comments conforming to the Guidelines. > We might get valuable input on where > hosted is lacking for them and we can finally announce hosted as not > being in beta anymore if that is still the status. > That's true. Although there are a few things that hosted definitely lacks before we're ready to take it out of beta. Off the top of my head: * free form web space. That allows hosting yum repos for the projects, download sites, non-trac-wiki space, etc. * Move the repositories to a separate server from the one that hosts our package SCM. (Waiting on hardware for this) - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG2IZvX6yAic2E7kgRAu7pAJ0c+hTwgaC+3QSjJGXFkrYUlGJL7gCgkFxK bVETZWIIQMZO2zVnT5Xht1c= =h9+V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
