seth vidal wrote:
Agreed. In the case of system-config-samba the spec file has this
mention:
# We are upstream, thus the source is only available from within this
#source
# package.
Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
I'm cc'ing the maintainer on this to see if we could convince him to
move system-config-samba out to hosted.fedoraproject.org to solve the
above problem.
Nils,
Would you be willing to move things off of elvis and onto
hosted.fedoraproject.org to help with the use of system-config-samba by
other distros?
Thanks!
-sv
Maybe the guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e
can be modified to recommend using hosted instead of adding comments
that the SRPM is the canonical source?
L10N folks are moving from elvis to public cvs too. Maybe we can stop
using it entirely for Fedora.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
