On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 13:48 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > Maybe the guidelines at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-413e1c297803cfa9de0cc4c56f3ac384bff5dc9e > > can be modified to recommend using hosted instead of adding comments > > that the SRPM is the canonical source? > > > We can add the recommendation but we can't eliminate the "SRPM is > canonical" language as long as people still want the SRPM to be the > canonical location. To remove the exception, you'll have to talk to the > devs involved to see whether they're against moving into hosted.fp.o. > > If everyone wants to we'd be happy to get rid of the exception :-) > I'm betting the number of srpm-is-canonical pkgs is not a huge number. I'm going to find out, though. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
