On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:23:47 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fr August 31 2007, Christian Iseli wrote: > > > It seems to grab the correct info, but please let me know if you notice > > funnies... > > > CVS stats: > > - 4918 packages with a devel directory > > - 8 packages with no owners entry > > FC-1 FC-2 FC-5 RHL-8 RHL-9 glibc32 glibc64 tdma > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This seems to be wrong. It sure looks fishy. The thing is that the CVS repo contains those directories, and each of those directories contains a devel subdirectory... exactly like a normal Fedora package. So it looks like a normal Fedora package that has no owner. I have no idea why those directories were created. I think it might have been a mistake, but maybe there was a purpose... The glibc32 and glibc64 look suspicious too... For tdma I can't find a package review request, so I suppose the CVS directory should be erased too (it's mostly empty anyway). Cheers, C -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
