Bernardo Innocenti (bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On 08/28/2007 01:58 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Bernardo Innocenti (bernie@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > >> If there are no resources to do it, I hereby volunteer > >> to do this work in due time, provided there's interest > >> from the current redhat-lsb maintainers to merge my > >> changes back. > > > > Taking patches, although I'd start with the stuff in /etc/init.d/functions. > > Agreed. My idea was to start by moving only the parts > of code that LSB advertises from /etc/init.d/functions > to /lib/lsb/init-functions. Would that make sense? Not unless lsb/init-functions moves to someplace that doesn't require the whole mess of the lsb stack; we don't want init scripts bringing in the entirety of openssl, X, cron, pax, shadow-utils, etc. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
