Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions vs. /etc/init.d/functions in init scripts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/28/2007 03:47 AM, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:

On the OLPC, we were concerned that the old initscript
infrastructure had a considerable overhead.  Would this
change have a beneficial impact on speed?

Now I've sneaked in /lib/lsb/init-functions and it's
apparent from the design that it's going to increase
the overhead sensibly (it sources the old functions
file multiple times).

This transition would be a good time to rewrite the
old init functions in C or speed them up in their
present shell form by dropping some old functionality.

If there are no resources to do it, I hereby volunteer
to do this work in due time, provided there's interest
from the current redhat-lsb maintainers to merge my
changes back.

--
  // Bernardo Innocenti
\X/  http://www.codewiz.org/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux