Rex Dieter wrote: > When it comes to *current* reviews/packages, simply follow the > current guidelines. Sure, that seems obvious. But there has been confusion about usage of a vendor_id previously (which I attributed to reviewers mistaking vendor_id for the Vendor: spec file tag). What I was wondering was whether there was an effort to change the guidelines regarding the vendor_id. If there is, the issues that *may* be caused by dropping a vendor_id from an existing .desktop file need to be addressed. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ People are crazy and times are strange I'm locked in tight, I'm out of range I used to care, but things have changed
Attachment:
pgptC1TDCep4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
