KH KH wrote: > You shouldn't use desktop-validate from within your spec file > because it will output rationnal (that's it's aim actually)... > Instead, you have to follow the guideline and still uses: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ > --delete-original \ > --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ > %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/foo.desktop Actually, it's not --vendor="", it's --vendor="<vendor_id>", with the explanation of vendor_id just below the examples: * If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as <vendor_id>. * It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the life of a package. This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names). I've seen a few reviewers telling people not to use vendor, which I tend to think is being confused with the Vendor: specfile tag. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Experience is not what happens to a man. It is what a man does with what happens to him. -- Aldous Huxley
Attachment:
pgpFFHXlFsr4D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
