Re: is "ps" broken in rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I wrote:
> Well, first I'll try to reproduce it locally using mock, but it'll take
> a bit of downloading ...

That worked ... just for the record, my first instinct was right: it
*was* a question of default buildroot contents being tightened.
It seems /bin/ps is not in the default buildroot anymore.  I would
have realized that immediately if I'd read the configure output
correctly:

...
checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl
checking for doxygen... no
checking for pdflatex... no
checking for makeindex... no
checking for icheck... no
checking for ps... ps
...

The "checking for ps" result does not mean it found ps, it means it
*failed* to find ps and is substituting a default value "ps" anyway,
because upstream wrote this configure test as
AC_PATH_PROG(PS, ps, ps)

Grumble.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux