On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 10:07:27AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> /data/sw1/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora/util-linux-ng-2.13-0.57.fc8.i386.rpm
> mount <= 2.11
> losetup <= 2.11
> schedutils <= 1.5
> util-linux <= 2.13.0.51
> setarch <= 2.0-4
>
> # rpm -q setarch
> setarch-2.0-4.fc7
>
>
> Fails because setarch-2.0-4.fc7 > setarch-2.0-4 ? Should it just be
> "Obsoletes: setarch <= 2.0"? Looks like it's fixed with "Obsoletes:
> setarch <= 2.0-99", but I'm curious if the former would work. Seems
> best to avoid the release tag if possible.
Well, either it obsoletes all setarch versions, then it should
Obsoletes: setarch
or it is expected that setarch-2.0-5 might exist and might be compatible
with it, then it should be
setarch < 2.0-5
to deal with the %{dist} stuff.
Jakub
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
