Chitlesh GOORAH a écrit : > On 8/24/07, Mark wrote: > >> Adding d3lphin to the fedora repository sounds like a good idea to me >> but don't delete dolphin or obsolete it with d3lphin. >> > > We can't ship both, can we ? > > d3lphin = dolphin + minor fixes + some minor enhancements > > Chitlesh > Hello, I think it will be better to name the package d3lphin, which should 'obsoletes' and 'provides' dolphin, as d3lphin is the official name, and is officially a dolphin's fork. Why should we keep existing dolphin as it ? It don't understand the benefit, as its is unmaintained upstream, and it will also give the maintainers some - in my opinion - useless work. Have a good day, Johan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
