Zoltan Kota wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Hans de Goede wrote:
Zoltan Kota wrote:
Checking the source files of 'recode' I found the following licenses:
mostly GPLv2+, LGPLv2+, and in some files GNU Library General Public
License.
According to gnu.org the GNU Library General Public License has been
succeeded by the GNU Lesser General Public License.
What should I use in the License tag??
/usr/bin/foo, build from 5 GPLv2+ files and one LGPLv2+ file -> its GPLv2+
/usr/lib/libfoo.so.0, build from 3 LGPLv2+ files -> its LGPLv2+
Now if you both of these in the same package then the package gets:
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
As it has binaries under 2 different licences in the package
As much as I could figure out both the util and the lib are built from
GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ source files. So they and the package itself are
GPLv2+, aren't they?
Yes that would be the case then.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
