On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Hans de Goede wrote: > Zoltan Kota wrote: > > Checking the source files of 'recode' I found the following licenses: > > mostly GPLv2+, LGPLv2+, and in some files GNU Library General Public > > License. > > According to gnu.org the GNU Library General Public License has been > > succeeded by the GNU Lesser General Public License. > > > > What should I use in the License tag?? > > > > /usr/bin/foo, build from 5 GPLv2+ files and one LGPLv2+ file -> its GPLv2+ > /usr/lib/libfoo.so.0, build from 3 LGPLv2+ files -> its LGPLv2+ > > Now if you both of these in the same package then the package gets: > > License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ > > As it has binaries under 2 different licences in the package > As much as I could figure out both the util and the lib are built from GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ source files. So they and the package itself are GPLv2+, aren't they? Zoltan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
