On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:51:36 +0200 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Right, point taken. However, that doesn't apply to these: > > package: Democracy - 0.9.5.1-8.fc7.i386 from fedora > unresolved deps: > firefox = 0:2.0.0.3 Democracy was obsoleted by Miro. Miro should be in updates. > package: dbmail-sqlite - 2.2.4-4.fc7.i386 from fedora > unresolved deps: > dbmail = 0:2.2.4-4.fc7 > package: gauche-gtk - 0.4.1-12.fc7.i386 from fedora > unresolved deps: > gauche = 0:0.8.10 > package: libgeda-doc - 20070216-1.fc7.i386 from fedora > unresolved deps: > libgeda = 0:20070216-1.fc7 > package: pcb-doc - 0.20060822-9.fc7.i386 from fedora > unresolved deps: > pcb = 0:0.20060822 > [...snip...] > package: syncekonnector - 0.3.2-2.fc7.i386 from updates > unresolved deps: > libkonnector.so.0 > libksync.so.1 > libmultisynk.so.0 > package: system-switch-java-gui - 1.0.0-1.fc7.noarch from fedora > unresolved deps: > system-switch-java = 0:1.0.0-1.fc7 > > Note that most of these packages come from the release tree (fedora > repository), and may have been updated meanwhile; dbmail-sqlite for > example doesn't get installed because it seems to have been integrated > into the dbmail package. Though, I specified -n so that repoclosure > would look at only the latest and greatest packages. Same goes for > system-switch-java-gui (in system-switch-java-1.1.0-2.fc7) > > What is it I'm missing this time? What I wanted this to do is report > to me which of the most recent packages I could not install due to > dependency errors: Not sure what's going on with the rest of those. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
