On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 16:36 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:12 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> This [1] is a rather ugly dependency checker for any number of > >> repositories. It uses yum to search for requirements that cannot be > >> resolved. > >> > >> I thought maybe because there's no dependency checking yet on updates > >> and such (don't know the details), and I needed this anyway, I'd just > >> dump it here and collect some useful comments. > > > > How does this differ from repoclosure in yum-utils? > > > > I'm assuming that if I use repoclosure with the system's yum > configuration, it tells me what it can't resolve just like when I would > yum install the package with missing dependencies -so correct me if I'm > wrong to assume that: > > A random example from repoclosure: > > # repoclosure -c /etc/yum.conf -a i386 -n > [...snip...] > package: dkms - 2.0.16-1.fc7.noarch from fedora > unresolved deps: > kernel-devel > [...snip...] > > # yum install dkms > [...snip...] > Installing: > dkms noarch 2.0.16-1.fc7 fedora 84 k > Installing for dependencies: > kernel-devel i686 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 updates 4.7 M > [...snip...] > > I'm not sure where it differs, but apparently repoclosure does some > things different from yum, as I'm sure this ugly depchecker does too. > repoclosure doesn't care about your local rpmdb. It takes a look at all the repositories you have and makes sure you have depset closure across all of them. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
