On 8/17/07, Adam Jackson <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:38 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > I am a bit confused about the division of labour in Fedora in > > reference to KDE : > > > > the fedora-desktop list seems to be unconcerned with things KDE, yet > > the scope of the discussions, and possible decisions seem to go beyond > > Gnome; to system wide changes. If decisions aren't limited to Gnome, > > shouldn't discussions include KDE? > > Speaking merely for the Red Hat desktop people, or maybe just for > myself: > > We're not talking about KDE because solving these problems twice is > deeply uninteresting. We're not planning to do anything that makes > KDE's life difficult, but we're not aware of all the issues and we don't > have the resources (or interest really) to discover them for ourselves. > We're happy to take input from KDE people, but so far we haven't > received much; perhaps none has been needed. Well it seems that I was just misunderstanding the issue : i was of the understanding that the fedora-desktop list was closely tied to the fedora-desktop spin, which I thought was Gnome only only - and hence the list was for gnome only issues. But seems that doesn't seem to be the case, I will not hesitate to post on the list, i've been subscribed to it for some time now. > Did you have a specific problem in mind? I do not; I was just following the "low hanging" thread on the desktop list and the topics being discussed went well beyond the desktop environment, but with no mention of KDE. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
