Re: Fedora KDE Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Jackson wrote:

> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:38 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:

>> the fedora-desktop list seems to be unconcerned with things KDE, yet
...
> We're not talking about KDE because solving these problems twice is
> deeply uninteresting.  We're not planning to do anything that makes
> KDE's life difficult, but we're not aware of all the issues and we don't
> have the resources (or interest really) to discover them for ourselves.
> We're happy to take input from KDE people, but so far we haven't
> received much; perhaps none has been needed.

Righto.

My $0.02: when discussions/decisions occur that may affect KDE, then it is
mostly a responsibility of the KDE SIG (and any other interested parties) to
get involved in the process.  This means, paying attention to the Desktop
SIG, fedora-desktop lists, etc... and jumping in to help where appropriate.

-- Rex


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux