On Friday, 17 August 2007 at 18:35, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > > freefem++ is one other thing depending on ufsparse, but it's not in CVS > > > > yet, awaiting arpack to pass review (Axel, are you alive there?). > > > > > > Sure, I'm waiting for the lapack <-> atlas issue to be resolved. > > > > Why haven't you filed a bug? You can't expect the problem to resolve by > > itself. > > Well, I think I saw that this was your package and since we were > discussing this in the review I thought you were aware of it. I'm also > not sure whether this is really an issue, it was reported as such by a > reviewer (yum picking the smallest name for fulfilling a dependency or > something along the lines which makes atlas win over lapack). To make things clear, because you seem a bit confused: arpack is your package and I am the reviewer. > At any rate the claim was that atlas(-devel?) provides equivalent > files like lapack but is still not working as a replacement. I haven't > checked whether this claim is true, this is something for lapack/atlas > experts to digest :) It was. I only tested it as much as to confirm that yum install atlas ; rpm -e lapack blas doesn't prevent apps linked against these from running. Regards, R. -- Fedora contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
