On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > freefem++ is one other thing depending on ufsparse, but it's not in CVS > > > yet, awaiting arpack to pass review (Axel, are you alive there?). > > > > Sure, I'm waiting for the lapack <-> atlas issue to be resolved. > > Why haven't you filed a bug? You can't expect the problem to resolve by > itself. Well, I think I saw that this was your package and since we were discussing this in the review I thought you were aware of it. I'm also not sure whether this is really an issue, it was reported as such by a reviewer (yum picking the smallest name for fulfilling a dependency or something along the lines which makes atlas win over lapack). At any rate the claim was that atlas(-devel?) provides equivalent files like lapack but is still not working as a replacement. I haven't checked whether this claim is true, this is something for lapack/atlas experts to digest :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpSLCj3unJXt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
