On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:22 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: = > I think this is wrong, I am sorry I didn't catch it before, but if > COPYING is not just a mere copy of the GPL license as published by the > FSF, but it is actually an obviously edited file which express the > intention of the Author, it do matter by all means, and it express the > license you should use. See my other email for this case, but yes: If the source code doesn't specify a version, and documentation exists from upstream that clearly shows the intention of the Author, then that documentation is valid for determining the license version. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
