Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hans de Goede wrote:

> The version of the COPYING[.lib] file is not relevant if the sourcecoe doesn't 
> contain a version its GPL+ resp. LGPLv2+

So if sourcecode doesn't mention a version but COPYING does, it's still
interpreted as "or any later version?"  Hm... that strikes me as odd.

> About GPL and LGPL. If libhandle is distributed as a seperate file under 
> /usr/lib, then the license tag would be:
> 
> License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+

Yup that's it...  I guess I'll look into making a -libs package in my
spare time.  :)

Thanks,

-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux