Matthias Saou wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote :
Some time ago many bugs where filed against packages with initscripts, asking
to make these initscripts lsb compliant.
After that there was some discussion if this was really a necessary operation,
as it wasn't sure yet if we would be switching to a startup replacement which
requires lsb compliance scripts. The outcome of the discussion then was to wait
with converting the scripts till things would be more clear.
Are things more clear now, are we going to switch init, and to a version which
makes these changes necessary, or should I close those bugs open against my
packages?
I have the exact same doubts myself :-)
I really think the "Unanswered questions" from the wiki page should be
addressed first :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts
As an example, I still don't know what the correct/best syntax is for a
service to not be run by default in any runlevels :
- No "Default-Stop" or "Default-Start"?
- "Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6"?
- "Default-Start:" and "Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6"?
- Something else?
I've gone with `No "Default-Stop" or "Default-Start"' so far.
I tried `"Default-Start:" and "Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6"' but IIRC
rpmlint complained about it.
Paul.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
