Hans de Goede wrote : > Some time ago many bugs where filed against packages with initscripts, asking > to make these initscripts lsb compliant. > > After that there was some discussion if this was really a necessary operation, > as it wasn't sure yet if we would be switching to a startup replacement which > requires lsb compliance scripts. The outcome of the discussion then was to wait > with converting the scripts till things would be more clear. > > Are things more clear now, are we going to switch init, and to a version which > makes these changes necessary, or should I close those bugs open against my > packages? I have the exact same doubts myself :-) I really think the "Unanswered questions" from the wiki page should be addressed first : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit/Initscripts As an example, I still don't know what the correct/best syntax is for a service to not be run by default in any runlevels : - No "Default-Stop" or "Default-Start"? - "Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6"? - "Default-Start:" and "Default-Stop: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6"? - Something else? Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) - Linux kernel 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 Load : 0.84 0.67 0.50 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
