Re: Disabling atime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:04:33 -0500, Eric Sandeen <esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> IOW, if this change is made, I think it should be done with eyes wide
> open - what is the measurable advantage, under what workloads, for what
> filesystems, etc - as well as what the potential drawbacks are.

Turning off atime is not new and even with ancient UNIXes it provided
miniscule gains in outright throughput, although I suspect it can be
possible to create a contrieved benchmark to demonstrate improvement.
I do not expect noatime to be justifiable on the grounds of performance.

However, if dropping atime allows to reduce the number of hard drive
spin-ups, I'm all for it.

-- Pete

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux