2007/8/10, dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On 8/10/07, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 04:38:33AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > >actually for various reasons i think relatime is a much better and > > > >cleaner solution in my eyes. > > > > > > I would appreciate more details. If you got various details, specify > them. > > > > Ingo's approach to relatime is very nice. Basically treating the atime as > > having a day sized granularity plus relative changes for comparisons with > > ctime/mtime - that means all the tmpwatch tools continue to work, HSM > > continues to work and mutt is happy > > that seems to way to go imho > not only for fedora but also upstream > > turning off features that have design flaws in my eyes simply isnt a fix, but only a mere attempt to cure the symptom from a pure philosophical point of view. surely alot of more experienced users do use and enjoy those workarounds but at the end of the day we are crippling features instead of fixing issues. workarounds just slow down fixes though. regards, Rudolf Kastl > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
