Jochen Schmitt <Jochen <at> herr-schmitt.de> writes: > A second view shows, that the package is licensed under the LGPLv2.1 The correct value for the License tag according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses is "LGPLv2" though, not "LGPLv2.1". And as the only actual difference between the LGPL 2(.0) and 2.1 is the renaming from "Library" to "Lesser", I doubt anybody cares about the difference, so please follow the guidelines there. Also, please check if the software you're packaging includes the "or (at your option) any later version" clause. If it does, please add a "+" to the License tag, i.e. "GPLv2+" or "LGPLv2+" instead of just "GPLv2" or "LGPLv2". But if the "any later clause" is NOT there, then please DO NOT include the "+". Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
