On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 13:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > umbers are good enough. > > > > At a very questionable price. > > > > Disabling SELinux provides the same amount of speed up. > > They aren't comparable. atime isn't a security feature and it is hardly > used by any software at all. * atime is a feature necessary to provide certain features to applications, such as time-based clean ups. * lack of atime in a filesystem cause functional regressions. SELinux is completely optional and doesn't cause functional regression. > > Nope, resistance against a tyrannic dictator. > > Stop your name calling Ralf. I haven't dictated anything here. You are. You've asked for opinions and so far have been completely ignoring any counterarguments and demonstrated your lack of understanding them. > It is > very shameful that you derail all the conversations with these kind of > personal attacks unrelated to the subject either on list or offlist very > frequently. Well, actually I think Fedora is derailing due to its leadership committing one mistake after the other. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
