> Pardon a silly question, but is it possible that > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251410, > "libtcl8.4.so lacks an SONAME record" > > is caused by this? Nope, sorry. You still have to know what you're doing with DSOs and supporting an ABI. ;-) Every general-purpose installed DSO should have an explicit SONAME, which you pass with the -Wl,-soname=foobar option. The maintainer of the package needs to grok what this means and what constitute ABI changes that mandate changing the SONAME. Thanks, Roland -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
