Re: Kernel Modules in Fedora -x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dragoran wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/7/07, *Jarod Wilson* <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     [...]
>     > You can add it and the re-sync generally works if the partition is not
>     > too busy, but it tends to be failed out of the array if it is left
>     > connected when the partition is very active.
> 
>     I wonder if the cfs scheduler would help with this any. And/or shutting
>     off beagle (which likes to absolutely slaughter the i/o on my
>     workstation).
> 
> 
>  cfs is a cpu scheduler we already have a fair io scheduler (cfq ;) )
> but cfq got some improvements too (uses a rbtree now like cfs)

Just throwing it out there, because the responsiveness of my desktop
went up like 100x while doing heavy lifting in the background (like a
kernel build) when I 1) upgraded it to a kernel w/cfs and 2) shut off
beagle indexing.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux